How do you manage noise emissions from the largest rail project in Australia?
by Arvind Deivasigamani, Aaron McKenzie
This article was originally published by IPRA.
With 2023 on track to become the hottest year on record, how companies behave and communicate vis-à-vis climate change is increasingly having a material impact on their operations.
Climate change-related lawsuits, for example, have more than doubled over the past five years, according to the UN Environment Programme (UNEP). In 2021, for instance, Shell was ordered to cut its carbon emissions faster by a Dutch court. And in early 2023, ClientEarth filed a lawsuit against 11 of the oil company’s directors at the High Court in England, claiming the company’s current climate strategy supposedly puts Shell at financial risk. And this is just one example: According to UNEP, some 2,180 cases have been filed over the past five years while there were just 884 documented as of 2017.
In the communications sphere in particular, environmental groups and governments appear to be growing increasingly frustrated with corporate claims about businesses’ reported contribution to tackling climate change – and they are leveraging a range of public instruments including lawsuits.
Indeed, the LSE’s Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment observes a veritable “explosion” of court cases dubbed ‘climate-washing’ in its 2023 snapshot on global trends. These challenge the accuracy of green claims and commitments. Reportedly, some cases seeking financial damages are also challenging disinformation, with many relying on consumer protection law.
Lufthansa, for example, had to defend its newly introduced Green Fares in early 2023 against reproaches of greenwashing, stating that the additional cost of each Green Fare will finance climate protection projects and sustainable aviation fuels. Similarly, KLM has discontinued its ‘Fly Responsibly’ advertising campaign after being sued over alleged greenwashing. Environmental groups said the adverts breached consumer law by misleading the public over how sustainable flights are.
Indeed, the travel, personal, and leisure industry as well as fossil fuels and transportation have seen the largest number of climate change lawsuits in 2022; but a range of industries including chemicals, food, utilities, and others have come under fire, as LSE’s researchers found. Any business can be hit.
The recent developments suggest that we may have to expect even more action against greenwashing as authorities and legislators are cracking down on what they see as misleading sustainability claims.
This is why global associations like IPRA seek to support their members with Climate Change Guidelines, calling for responsible behavior, integrity, and accuracy around climate change and actively preventing greenwashing. Similarly, recommendations such as the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct encourage enterprises to make “information available in plain language and ensure the accuracy of any claim regarding environmental or social performance.”
Affecting companies in one of the biggest economies, EU institutions finalised the Green Claims Directive in September 2023 which explicitly tackles Greenwashing. The directive aims to eliminate misleading environmental messaging by setting out the EU’s first set of detailed rules for how companies should market their environmental impacts and performance. Once the directive comes into force in 2024 as expected, EU members will have 18 months to transpose it into national law.
The Green Claims Directive lays down detailed rules on the substantiation, communication, and verification of voluntary environmental claims and environmental labels used by traders that market products to EU consumers. As part of them, environmental claims such as 'climate neutral' or ‘eco’ are banned by 2026 unless companies can prove the claim is accurate. And the rules also make it illegal to base such claims on off-setting. Knowledge about such rules will be key for communicators going forward.
Legislation such as the Green Claims Directive means it will become even harder to ‘gloss over’ sustainability and especially climate strategies that are not up to standard and expectations. For example: climate targets that speak of achieving net zero emissions by 2050 are not ‘ambitious’. It’s what people increasingly expect as a minimum, with leading companies aiming for earlier dates or becoming even climate positive or negative, depending on the preference in choice of words.
So, the best way to avoid greenwashing reproaches is to develop sustainability strategies based on sound stakeholder engagement and evidence, looking at the most material topics, set the right targets that comply with the latest science, and develop as well as implement a clear, KPI-based sustainability and carbon reduction roadmap. And along the way engage and communicate real progress continuously in a truthful, transparent way with all stakeholders, based on reliable evidence.
It is therefore high time to review the potential gap between words and action. To comply with the EU Green Claims Directive, companies within the EU should then take 10 key steps to avoid greenwashing:
While ensuring compliance will require more effort and care in communication, compliance with legislation will also provide guidance, confidence to ‘be safe’ and enable making informed decisions. Real contributions to a green transition will have it easier in the market and be more recognised as such. All of which is good news for both consumers and for the increasing number of companies that are on their honest journey towards improved sustainability as needed to meet global sustainability goals.
These are, in the end, not about ‘saving the world’ or ‘the climate’, but about saving our personal good lives and allowing others to lead theirs, too. Sustainability goals are about us. About our own presence and our own future: our cities, our food, our health, our neighborhoods, and our wealth.
by Arvind Deivasigamani, Aaron McKenzie
by Emma Elbaum