The benefits of cost estimating early in projects

Post Date
10 January 2023
Read Time
2 minutes

Cost estimating is tricky when you have a detailed design in front of you, and it’s even more challenging when the design is a few lines on the page. But that should not be an excuse for early involvement from specialized cost estimators when it comes to large infrastructure projects.

The key risk every owner will have to address in every project is cost. This is the one thing that clients and funding agencies continually assess in the development of options assessments, business cases, design, construction, and operational phases. Value for money – as low cost as possible for a good outcome, is the community’s expectation and in water infrastructure projects, the community is the ultimate client. Cost blowout is a substantial risk on any project, particularly on large water infrastructure projects. So, is it any surprise that cost is critical to a project’s success?

In almost every phase of a water infrastructure project, cost is the last thing addressed – tacked on once all the technical studies and design is done. The problem with this approach is that while cost is a critical decision-making element, it’s not given the time in a project to develop project understanding, local or regional context, risk to procurement and delivery, nor construction methods and construction risk. Options assessment or early planning projects are particularly vulnerable, as costs are not usually developed by specialized and experienced practitioners. This means, options assessments can only achieve comparative costs for similar types of solutions.

Clients and owners rely on decision-making tools during early phases of a project, for example multi-criteria analysis (MCA). Of note, cost is usually a stand-alone item, in water projects often classed as cost per megalitre per annum, where an MCA is comparing non cost, or subjective issues.

If we don’t give cost it’s due diligence during early phases, we are potentially making the wrong decision. Clearly, that is not good for any stakeholder.

I propose we turn this on its head and invest in experienced cost estimators in the options phases of the project. With careful communication and management of the ‘lines on the page’, cost estimators can bring massive value to decision making.

Recent posts

  • California poppy, California state flower
    Insight

    15 May 2026

    6 minutes read

    Navigating California’s climate disclosure bills: What businesses need to know ahead of the August 10th deadline

    by Jackie Ruggiero, Emma Lawrence, Brianna Betts


    View post
  • solar energt
    Insight

    13 May 2026

    4 minutes read

    UKREiiF 2026: Back to the future: Why local energy is the key to the new town revolution

    by Richard Jardine


    View post
  • Man in factory analysisng data about energy performance of machinery
    Insight

    12 May 2026

    9 minutes read

    Leveraging the energy transition for cost savings

    by Matthew Roman, Mateo de Guadalfajara


    View post
See all posts