
Reforming the NSIP regime: Balancing speed and quality in infrastructure development
by Andy Gregory
View post
As we approached the turn of the decade, environmental issues became closer to the forefront of public concern, and with that, political concern. The 2020s are set to be the decade of environmental action, and amongst the most pressing and imminent challenges before us Air Quality is high up on the list.
According to the World Health Organisation, poor air quality is responsible for 4.2 million deaths worldwide every year[1]. For plants which operate in the UK, their impacts must be assessed under the Air Quality Standards Regulations 2010, the Environment Act 1995, and the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 – to name a few.
The burning of fuels produce a variety of nasty biproducts which pollute the atmosphere. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), for example, is a gaseous pollutant which is a primary cause for concern across the globe due to its abilities to cause adverse health impacts on people and damage to ecological systems. In order to ensure minimal impacts from a new emission source, an air quality assessment must be produced by quantifying the impacts using an atmospheric dispersion model.
As with any kind of computer model, an atmospheric dispersion model is a mathematical representation of real-world processes. As such, the model itself can only ever be as accurate and reliable as the data you put into it - and there is a lot of data to put into it.
The following parameters are required before you can begin to quantify the impact of your new emissions source:
Before you can run your model, you also have to define the following:
Only once all these parameters have been defined and loaded into your atmospheric dispersion model can you run the model and quantify the impacts of your new emission source on the surrounding receptors.
The now predicted process contribution (PC) at each of your receptors must be assessed to determine whether the increase in concentrations are significant or insignificant. If it is significant, the impact can be investigated further by looking at the existing baseline.
If the results show that the new source is going to pose a risk to human or ecological health, there would be a requirement to redesign or consider an altogether different location – thereby ensuring the safety of the public and natural ecosystems.
[1] WHO, https://www.who.int/health-topics/air-pollution#tab=tab_1, accessed 26th March 2020.
by Andy Gregory
by Ashleigh Turner
by Dr. Ben Cook, Eoin Noble